Why We Need Civil Disobedience

In September of 2006, at the height of the U.S. war against Iraq, I participated in an act of Civil Disobedience in the Hart Senate Office Building in protest. Since then, I have been arrested twice more in front of the White House in anti-war demonstrations, and once this summer in a witness against the Free Trade Agreement with Colombia.

As I prepared to participate in that first act of nonviolent protest in Washington, I wrote the following words in my blog:

I have written and spoken often about my conviction that our witness as people of faith should, wherever possible, be a positive one. What we as followers of Jesus are for is far more compelling than what we are against, and we must accept the challenge to live out Jesus’ absurd conviction that we are most secure, and most right with God, when we love our enemies.

It is that desire to be a witness for Christ that has led me to become a reservist with Christian Peacemaker Teams. It is what has compelled me to be involved in the work of trying to save the lives of folks who are dying in the desert. It was what compelled me to become the Director of the Presbyterian Peace Fellowship with the hope of creating a corps of Presbyterians who will offer nonviolent accompaniment wherever sisters and brothers in our partner churches are at risk around the world.

Though I remain firm in that core commitment to offer positive, Christ-centered, alternatives to violence, I also believe that there are times when evil is so strong, and so interwoven into the fabric of our culture, that God demands that we rise up in protest.

For me, the moment to stand up and say “no” can no longer be avoided.

As followers of the Prince of Peace, how shall we respond when acts of terror are carried out against civilian populations, including our own? What are we to do when our own government embraces the use of force on our behalf? Nonviolent action, including Civil Disobedience, is the most effective way to live what we say we believe.

I feel fortunate to live in a country where there is a history of organized, nonviolent protest that is, by and large, respected and protected by our government. As I’ve watched the “Arab Spring” from afar over the last eight months, I’ve been moved as millions of people have embraced the strategies and tactics of nonviolence to advance their cause – even in the face of the greatest possible threat against their lives.

Many in that movement have looked to successes in nonviolent organizing and civil disobedience from around the world for both inspiration and instruction on nonviolence and civil disobedience. A graphic, comic book style illustration of the life and work of Dr. King, created by the Fellowship of Reconciliation was widely disseminated in Egypt during the uprising there earlier this year.

Over the past few weeks, several thousand people have been arrested in front of the White House in the protest against the Tar Sands pipeline, organized by environmental author Bill McKibben. McKibben pointed out that part of what is taking place, even in an arrest as carefully choreographed and carrying as little risk as this one, is that people of conscience who believe in the rule of law are both discovering and making public their own seriousness of purpose about a matter of great importance.

We are people of faith. We live in a country that values and protects the right of dissent. As we look back on the recent 10th anniversary of 9/11, we must face the hard truth that we are a people who live in fear, even while we live in the most militarily and economically powerful nation on earth – a dangerous combination.

The tactics of nonviolence – and the use of principled acts of civil disobedience – have never been more important than they are right now.

Rick Ufford-Chase

Rick Ufford-Chase

is the Executive Director of the Presbyterian Peace Fellowship.
This entry was posted in Theology and tagged , , , , , . Bookmark the permalink.
  • Pingback: Friday Link Love… And More with the Friars « The Blue Room

  • Anonymous

    I feel like I should say that Rick Ufford-Chase is pretty much my favorite Presbyterian. He preached at San Francisco Theological Seminary when I was attending there and he really laid it on us. In essence his message was that if we as candidates for ministry didn’t have the courage to confront our congregation’s responsibility for the injustices in our society then we had no business getting ordained. If we weren’t going to say that there was something wrong with the wealthiest per capita denomination sitting on its hands while immigrants were dying in attempted border crossings then we had no business going in to ministry. It made an impression.

  • Scott Fairbanks

    The news this week reported that the king of Saudi Arabia has extended the right to vote to women. I don’t pretend that this was an act of blessed suffrage and equality. But it was progress. The antecedent to this decision was likely a television commercial by the oil industry, the tar sand proponents, in Canada that points out that when we buy our oil from Saudi Arabia, we are strengthening a misogynistic regime that uses its funds to support civilly disobedient muslims throughout the world. I wish that the oil-men had invoked the ‘buy local’ principle. It makes little sense to use precious calories to transport our calories to the western hemisphere when we can produce those calories locally.

    Nearly simultaneous to this news, it was reported that teeming swarms, about a hundred or so, protestors made signs and marched on parliament hill to protest the development of the tar sand oil fields. They then likely got in their cars went to the grocery and bought food shipped from far away lands in plastic containers as a burqa covered third wife of some sheik prepared breakfast far away…

    I’m sure that when Rick conflates a highly divisive partisan issue with the gospel, he think he is doing the Lord’s work. I’m pleased to see citizenry exercising their rights to express their displeasure with policies they find disagreeable. But I would hope that a small tremor of fear would shake through his bones when he invokes our blessed Lord’s name in his pursuits.

    • Anonymous

      I don’t see Rick conflating anything with the Gospel. He is clear that his motivation is the Gospel call to follow Jesus in nonviolent resistance to evil. He then names examples of people practicing nonviolent resistance, but never implies that any particular issue is somehow directly tied to the gospel, merely that WHEN Christians feel compelled to identify something as wrong this is how they do it. You seem to disagree that the Tar Sands project qualifies for this kind of resistance (though it is just an example Rick uses that is current and not the one for which he himself was actually arrested), fair enough.

      As for people feeling fear for invoking the name of Jesus – nah. Jesus himself had no problem with people doing stuff in his name. Far worse really are those who cry ‘Lord Lord’ all the time in their prayers and in worship, and who never actually get off their knees to work for the Kingdom in some concrete way.

      • Scott Fairbanks

        Far worse still would be making a golden calf. Saying that this issue, or this cause, describes Jesus, that our pet cause captures his character. I write a letter to the editor of the paper about the tar sands. I might vehemently debate a brother about it, or even throw my body upon the gears, but to deliberately break laws, and to declare to the world that I’m doing it by God’s will hardly hallows his name. It tarnishes his name.

        I’m sure you could spend about three seconds thinking of people that Jesus might have a problem doing stuff in his name… Westboro Baptist, Anders Breivik, KKK.. Nah?

  • Pingback: Not Violent Enough | Two Friars and a Fool

  • Pingback: Not Violent Enough? « The Blue Room